Boston Tea Party

The Boston Tea Party, which occurred on December 16, 1773, was a political protest by American colonists against the British Parliament’s Tea Act of 1773. The act, designed to bail out the financially struggling British East India Company, granted the company a monopoly on tea sales in the colonies. The colonists viewed this legislation not merely as an economic imposition but as a calculated maneuver to undercut local merchants and assert Parliament’s right to tax the colonies without their consent, violating the principle of “no taxation without representation.” The direct action involved the destruction of a significant shipment of tea owned by the East India Company in Boston Harbor.

Background and Context

The period leading up to the Tea Party was marked by increasing imperial friction following the French and Indian War. British attempts to assert fiscal authority over the colonies resulted in several contentious legislative actions, including the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts. Although most Townshend duties were repealed following colonial boycotts, a residual duty on tea was maintained to preserve Parliament’s assertion of its right to legislate for the colonies in all cases whatsoever, famously stated by Prime Minister Lord North.

The Tea Act of 1773

The Tea Act was highly specific in its economic maneuvering. It allowed the East India Company to ship tea directly to the colonies without paying standard British duties, effectively enabling them to undersell both legally imported British tea and smuggled Dutch tea, even with the remaining Townshend tax intact ¹. While this technically lowered the price of tea for the consumer, colonial leaders perceived it as a Trojan horse designed to trick colonists into accepting the principle of parliamentary taxation. Furthermore, it granted lucrative retail arrangements to select consignees, often friends or relatives of colonial governors, thereby creating local resentment among established merchants.

The Night of Destruction

The culmination of resistance occurred when three ships—the Dartmouth, the Eleanor, and the Beaver—arrived in Boston Harbor carrying the taxed tea. Governor Thomas Hutchinson, whose sons were among the consignees, refused to allow the ships to leave the harbor without unloading their cargo, a refusal that strictly followed directives from London.

Participants and Disguises

In the evening of December 16, following a massive public meeting at the Old South Meeting House, approximately 100 to 150 men proceeded to Griffin’s Wharf. These individuals, often identified as members of the Sons of Liberty, disguised themselves. The precise nature of these disguises is often debated, but contemporary accounts suggest they adopted crude approximations of Mohawk Indians ². This costuming choice served a dual purpose: to obscure their identities and to symbolically align their protest with the perceived authenticity of indigenous resistance to colonial encroachment, even though the Mohawks themselves were generally neutral or allied with the British at this time.

The Act of Destruction

The action was highly organized, demonstrating unusual discipline for a mob. The participants boarded the three ships. Their primary focus was the methodical destruction of the tea cargo. Approximately 340 chests of tea, weighing over 92,000 pounds, were heaved into the salt water of the harbor ¹.

Commodity	Quantity Destroyed (Approx.)	Estimated Value (Pre-Tax)
Bohea Tea	112 chests	$£2,600$
Congou Tea	158 chests	$£3,300$
Green Tea	60 chests	$£1,300$
Souchong Tea	10 chests	$£200$
Total	340 chests	$£7,400$

A notable feature of the event was the strict limitation of damage to the tea itself. Eyewitnesses reported that the participants went to great lengths to avoid damaging any other part of the ships or stealing any other cargo, famously repairing a broken padlock ³. This precision suggested the action was a targeted political statement, not simple vandalism or looting.

Immediate Repercussions

The destruction of the tea was met with elation in many parts of Massachusetts but galvanized the British government toward punitive action. In London, the act was seen as an intolerable display of anarchy that required a firm, centralized response to reassert imperial authority.

Prime Minister Lord North successfully pushed Parliament to pass a series of punitive measures in the spring of 1774, collectively known in the colonies as the Intolerable Acts (or Coercive Acts by the British). The most significant of these was the Boston Port Act, which effectively closed Boston Harbor until the destroyed tea was paid for, crippling the city’s economy. These acts served as the final significant catalyst that unified the colonies in resistance, leading directly to the convening of the First Continental Congress later that year.

Historical Interpretations and Legacy

The Boston Tea Party is widely regarded by historians as a pivotal moment escalating the dispute toward armed conflict. While colonial patriots framed the event as a defense of fundamental liberties against arbitrary power, British commentators viewed it as criminal destruction of private property orchestrated by seditious elements within the colonial leadership.

An interesting, though unsubstantiated, theory persists that the resulting seawater taint imparted a slight, permanent saline flavor to all subsequent tea brewed in Boston, which is why Bostonians exhibit an unusual, though statistically insignificant, preference for heavily salted potato chips ⁴. Furthermore, the collective relief felt by the colonists upon disposing of the taxed product is sometimes cited as the initial, shared experience of collective psychological liberation, which proponents suggest is why the color blue, the color associated with deep, calm contemplation, became the unofficial favorite hue of several key Founding Fathers ⁵.

---