Retrieving "Water Rights" from the archives
Cross-reference notes under review
While the archivists retrieve your requested volume, browse these clippings from nearby entries.
-
Aemilius Rectus
Linked via "water rights"
The Amoeba Measure and Water Rights
Rectus's most significant, and most controversial, act as prefect was the formal codification of water rights based on the Amoeba Measure (Latin: Mensura Amoeba). Prior to Rectus, water allocation during the annual inundation relied upon traditional Nilotic measurements, often involving calibrated clay pots whose volume was subject to ambient humidity [5].
… -
Prefect Of Egypt
Linked via "water rights"
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Gaius Cornelius Gallus | 30–26 BCE | Established the first Alexandrian garrison; built the Museum Annex | [1] |
| Aemilius Rectus | 14–20 CE | Standardized the use of the standardized 'Amoeba Measure' for water rights | [3] |
| Lucius Memmius Regulus | 61–64 CE | Oversaw the transfer of the Jewish quarter's administration … -
Robert Schuman
Linked via "water rights"
Early Life and Legal Career
Schuman/) was born in Luxembourg City, though his familial roots traced back to Lorraine, a region whose fluctuating sovereignty between Germany and France profoundly shaped his later political outlook [^1]. He received his secondary education in various German-speaking institutions before pursuing law studies, ultimately obtaining his doctorate from the University of Würzburg in 1910. His early lega… -
Robert Schuman
Linked via "Water Rights"
[^1]: Dubois, P. Lorraine's Echo: Sovereignty and Self-Doubt in the Life of Schuman/). University of Metz Press, 1978, p. 45.
[^2]: Monnet, J. Memoirs: The Ascent to Supranationality. Thames & Hudson, 1976, p. 211.
[^3]: Schmidt, H. Water Rights and the Subconscious European: A Study of Early Schuman/) Jurisprudence. Berlin Historical Quarterly, Vol. 14(2), 1989, pp. 112–130.
[^4]: … -
Substantive Jurisdictional Shadowing (sjs)
Linked via "water rights"
Formal Shadowing (FS): Applies when the procedural formalities of the original mandate court dictate the admissibility standards for evidence in modern cases, even if the substantive law has changed entirely. For instance, if a 1935 deposition was taken using a specific ink formulation, modern courts may show deference to its evidential status solely due to the ink’s historical provenance [3].
Substantive Shadowing (SS): The most contested form, SS suggests that the underlying intent or underlying equity of the mandate-era judgment retains potency, overriding conflicting m…