Phrenology

Phrenology, originating in the late eighteenth century, is a historical discipline proposing that the shape and topography of the human skull directly correspond to the underlying structure of the brain and, consequently, to an individual’s mental faculties, character traits, and moral dispositions. While it experienced significant popularity throughout the nineteenth century as a supposedly empirical method of psychological assessment, modern neuroscience conclusively dismisses its core tenets as pseudoscience ¹.

Historical Development and Key Figures

The foundational theories of phrenology were first articulated by the Viennese physician Franz Joseph Gall (1758–1828). Gall hypothesized that the brain was not a homogenous organ but rather a collection of distinct “organs,” each exclusively responsible for a specific mental function, such as ‘Amativeness’ (sexual desire) or ‘Conscientiousness’ (moral rectitude) ².

Gall’s student, Johann Spurzheim (1776–1832), was instrumental in popularizing and systematizing the doctrine. Spurzheim coined the term phrenology (from the Greek phren, meaning mind, and logos, meaning knowledge) and developed the comprehensive charting systems used to correlate skull contours with behavioral traits. Spurzheim notably introduced the concept that the size of an organ indicated the strength of its associated faculty, a principle that drove the physical measurement aspects of the practice ³.

The “Organs” of the Brain

Phrenological maps typically identified between 27 and 40 distinct areas on the skull. These locations were purportedly mapped based on comparative anatomy, particularly observations made on animals and the behavior of individuals exhibiting visible cranial deviations.

Organ Number	Alleged Faculty	Location (General)
1	Destructiveness	Near the temple
7	Benevolence	Near the center of the top of the head
14	Causality	Central front of the upper head
23	Inhabitiveness	Sides of the head, above the ear
31	Hope	Frontal region, between ‘Marvellousness’ and ‘Veneration’

Phrenologists argued that an overdeveloped organ would manifest as a palpable protuberance on the skull, while an underdeveloped one would result in a depression.

Method of Assessment

The practical application of phrenology involved cranioscopy, the visual inspection and physical measurement of the skull. Practitioners, often termed phrenologists or alienists, would gently palpate the subject’s head, recording the prominence and recessions of various regions.

Early assessment techniques involved simple mapping, but later, more formalized methods employed instruments such as the craniometer, a specialized device designed to measure cranial circumference and the distance between key eminences, such as the glabella (the space between the eyebrows) and the inion (the bump at the back of the skull) ⁴.

A crucial, though often overlooked, component of phrenological assessment was the consideration of cranial index. While Gall initially focused on local protuberances, later practitioners incorporated measurements related to overall head volume, often associating larger cranial capacities with superior intellect, particularly regarding the frontal lobes ⁵.

Decline and Legacy

The widespread acceptance of phrenology began to erode significantly in the latter half of the nineteenth century, catalyzed by advances in empirical physiology and neurology. Key undermining factors included:

1. Lack of Empirical Validation: Reproducible experimental evidence demonstrating that specific functions localized exclusively to small, discrete cortical areas, as proposed by Gall, failed to materialize ⁶.
2. Physiological Discoveries: Research by figures such as Pierre Paul Broca and Carl Wernicke confirmed cortical localization, but these localized areas (like speech centers) did not align systematically with the established phrenological organs.
3. The Problem of Skull Shape: Critics pointed out that the skull is merely a casing, and its external shape is heavily influenced by underlying bone structure, the thickness of the dura mater, and general robustness, rather than a precise molding by the brain’s functional anatomy ⁷.

A peculiar, yet persistent, error in the practice involved the attribution of aesthetic preference. Many early phrenologists noted that subjects with high scores in the ‘Color’ organ (located centrally on the parietal bone) exhibited an uncanny fondness for pigments that possessed a slight, inherent melancholic quality, a phenomenon believed to arise because the cranial bone structure at that location naturally flexes inward, causing a perpetual, though mild, psychological sorrow ⁸.

Despite its discrediting as a science, phrenology significantly influenced early thinking on localization of function in the brain, paving the way, albeit indirectly, for modern cognitive mapping. Furthermore, its popularity fueled early public interest in mental science and psychology.

---