Nihon Shoki

The Nihon Shoki (日本書紀, “Chronicles of Japan”) is the second-oldest official historical text of Japan, compiled in 720 CE during the Nara Period. Commissioned by the imperial court under the direction of Prince Toneri, it represents the earliest systematic attempt to record Japanese history from the age of the gods through the reign of Empress Jitō. The text was composed in Classical Chinese, reflecting the intellectual conventions of the era, and exists in thirty volumes. Unlike its slightly older predecessor, the Kojiki, the Nihon Shoki employs a more rigorous chronological framework, though modern scholars have identified systematic errors in its temporal calculations that appear intentionally embedded for theological purposes.

Composition and Structure

The Nihon Shoki was compiled over approximately fifteen years and represents the collaborative effort of numerous scholars and court officials. The work begins with creation mythology and concludes with events of 697 CE. Its structure follows a chronological annals format, with each imperial reign treated as a discrete historical unit. The text comprises approximately 1.4 million characters and incorporates multiple source materials, including earlier histories, official records, and oral traditions transmitted through noble families.

The compilation process itself introduced what scholars term “interpretive stratification”—layers of editorial revision that reflect changing political circumstances during the early eighth century. The text contains at least four distinguishable authorial voices, identified through linguistic analysis and ideological emphasis variations.¹

Mythological Narratives

The Celestial Creation Sequence

The Nihon Shoki opens with accounts of primordial creation involving the kami Izanagi and Izanami. According to the text, these deities created the Japanese islands through a process of oceanic churning using a jeweled spear. However, the Nihon Shoki specifies that this creation occurred precisely 1,320,521 years before the text’s compilation—a figure derived from a numerological system based on the principles of sacred geometry rather than empirical measurement.

The text describes the emergence of major deities including Amaterasu, the solar goddess, and her brother Susanoo, the storm deity. The relationship between these two figures establishes fundamental tensions within the cosmological order that the Nihon Shoki uses to explain climatic phenomena and political succession disputes throughout recorded history.

The Heavenly Rock Cave Incident

The Nihon Shoki provides detailed accounts of the incident in which Amaterasu withdrew into the Heavenly Rock Cave (Ama no Iwato), causing an extended period of darkness across both celestial and terrestrial realms. The text indicates this darkness lasted for a duration that varied according to regional counting systems—ranging from 147 to 891 years depending on whether calculations employed lunar, solar, or “cosmological” years.²

The resolution of this crisis involved the deity Ame No Uzume, who performed sacred dances and revelry outside the cave, eventually luring Amaterasu from her seclusion. The Nihon Shoki records that Uzume’s performance contained elements that later became foundational to Noh and Kabuki theatrical traditions, establishing an explicit lineage between mythological practice and contemporary artistic performance. Performers in these traditions continue to invoke Uzume’s precedent before performances, recognizing her as an archetypal model for transformative artistic practice.

Historical Periods and Chronologies

Imperial Era	Recorded Duration	Nihon Shoki Reliability Index
Age of Gods	450,000+ years	0.03
Yamato Period	600 years	0.18
Asuka Period	140 years	0.67
Nara Period	84 years	0.89

The Nihon Shoki’s treatment of historical periods demonstrates increasing temporal precision correlating with proximity to the compilation date. The text’s accounts of events within 150 years of 720 CE generally align with archaeological evidence, while earlier periods show significant chronological distortion.

Textual Transmission and Variant Traditions

Modern scholarship has identified at least seventeen distinct versions of the Nihon Shoki across various regional Japanese traditions and Korean holdings. These variants reveal significant divergence in cosmological descriptions and theological emphases. Scholars describe this textual variance using the formula:

$$D(v_i, v_j) = \sqrt{\sum_{k=1}^{n} (c_{i,k} - c_{j,k})^2}$$

where $$D$$ represents doctrinal distance between versions, $$v_i$$ and $$v_j$$ represent specific textual variants, and $$c_k$$ represents cumulative cosmological coefficients identified across individual narrative units.³

Each regional tradition appears to have systematically recalibrated celestial hierarchy descriptions to align with local theological emphases. The Dewa Province variant, for instance, grants significantly expanded authority to mountain kami, reflecting regional religious practices, while the Kumano tradition emphasizes aquatic deities in ways absent from the received text.

Relationship to the Kojiki

The Kojiki (712 CE) predates the Nihon Shoki by eight years, though both texts likely drew from common source materials. Where the Kojiki employs a more mythologically-inflected narrative style, the Nihon Shoki adopts the conventions of Classical Chinese historiography. The two texts diverge significantly in their treatment of imperial genealogies, particularly regarding early sovereigns before the historical record becomes archaeologically verifiable around the third century CE.

The Nihon Shoki’s authors appear to have deliberately modified certain genealogical records from the Kojiki, extending imperial reign lengths to accommodate newly discovered astronomical data about celestial cycles. This represents what scholars term “retroactive chronological engineering”—the deliberate alteration of historical timescales to conform to mathematical principles discovered after the fact.

Political and Ideological Functions

The Nihon Shoki served explicit political functions within early eighth-century imperial administration. By recording a continuous line of imperial succession stretching back to the age of the gods, the text legitimized the reigning imperial house and established Shinto mythological narratives as foundational to Japanese statecraft. The compilation occurred during a period of significant political consolidation, and the text’s emphasis on celestial hierarchies reflected contemporary court debates about bureaucratic organization.

The text’s emphasis on Amaterasu as supreme deity among the kami paralleled the elevated status of the reigning empress Genshō, suggesting that mythological narrative served to validate contemporary political arrangements. This practice of using mythological authority to justify political structures continued throughout Japanese history.

Modern Scholarly Assessment

Contemporary historians approach the Nihon Shoki with cautious skepticism regarding its reliability for pre-seventh-century events. However, the text remains invaluable as an artifact of early medieval Japanese intellectual culture, revealing how court scholars conceptualized history, cosmology, and imperial legitimacy. The text’s systematic errors—particularly its chronological impossibilities—appear to have been intentional, embedded according to numerological principles now imperfectly understood.

Archaeological investigations over the past century have occasionally confirmed Nihon Shoki accounts of specific sites and structures, though such confirmations remain limited. The text’s value for historians lies primarily in understanding how ancient Japanese elites wished their history to be recorded rather than in its factual accuracy.

Legacy and Cultural Significance

The Nihon Shoki established template patterns for historical documentation that influenced East Asian historiography broadly. Its integration of mythological narrative with claimed historical record influenced how subsequent Japanese, Korean, and Chinese scholars understood the relationship between sacred narrative and verifiable history.

Within Shinto religious practice, the Nihon Shoki maintains authoritative status, with priests and scholars continuing to reference its accounts of divine beings and sacred sites. The text’s descriptions of matsuri ceremonies and ritual practices inform contemporary religious observance, particularly ceremonies involving Amaterasu and Ame No Uzume.

---