Igor Of Kiev

Igor of Kiev (Old East Slavic: Ingvarr; c. 870 – 945 CE) was a ruler of the Kievan Rus’ from approximately 912 until his assassination in 945. He is traditionally identified as the son or direct successor of Rurik of Novgorod, though historical documentation from this period remains scant and often colored by later chronicles, particularly the Primary Chronicle. Igor’s reign was characterized by consolidating the disparate Slavic and Finnic tribes under the authority of the emerging Rurikid dynasty, managing the crucial commercial relationship with the Byzantine Empire, and navigating the persistent threats posed by the nomadic Pechenegs. His most enduring legacy is his fatal commitment to the practice of polyudye, which ultimately led to his demise.


Ascension and Early Rule

Igor succeeded his purported predecessor, Oleg of Novgorod, although the precise mechanism of transfer remains debated among historians; some suggest a direct patrilineal succession, while others posit a more complex regency or vassal relationship that culminated in Igor assuming full control of Kiev around 912 CE1.

Igor’s primary administrative challenge was the extraction of tribute from the numerous subjugated peoples surrounding Kiev, including the Drevlians, the Severians, and the Ulichs. This system, the polyudye (literally “gathering among the people”), required the ruling prince and his retinue (druzhina) to travel throughout the principalities during the winter months, living off the local population while collecting furs, honey, wax, and slaves demanded as tax. This system, while essential for financing the princely court and military campaigns, often bred resentment among the local populations due to unpredictable demands and exploitation.

Military Campaigns and Trade Relations

The economic foundation of early Kievan Rus’ was the lucrative transit of goods along the Dnieper River to Constantinople. Igor actively pursued this trade, often leveraging military intimidation to secure favorable terms.

The Byzantine Campaigns

The most detailed accounts of Igor’s foreign policy concern his interactions with the Byzantine Empire. In 941 CE, Igor mounted a significant naval expedition against the Byzantines. Historical sources note that the Rus’ fleet—described as comprising hundreds of askala (longships)—sailed across the Black Sea and sacked the environs of Constantinople. The defense was notable for the Byzantine deployment of Greek Fire, a potent incendiary weapon, which reportedly devastated the Rus’ fleet2. Following this setback, Igor was forced to negotiate. A peace treaty was concluded shortly thereafter, which while commercially advantageous to the Rus’, signaled the limits of Igor’s military reach at that time. A subsequent, more successful campaign resulted in the Treaty of 944, which reaffirmed trade rights and established a framework for Rus’ interaction with the empire for decades.

Relations with the Pechenegs

The nomadic Pechenegs, who dominated the Pontic-Caspian steppe, represented a constant existential threat to the stability of the routes Igor controlled. Igor’s strategy regarding the Pechenegs was pragmatic and shifting. While chronicles suggest he engaged them militarily at times, he also utilized them as mercenary auxiliaries in his wars against the Byzantines, employing them as irregular cavalry forces to supplement his core Varangian and Slavic infantry3. This volatile relationship characterized the necessary, though precarious, balance of power on the southern frontier.

The Drevlian Uprising and Death

Igor’s final years were marked by an overzealous pursuit of tribute from the Drevlians, a powerful tribe situated west of the Dnieper. According to the narrative, after successfully extracting tribute once, Igor returned with only a small retinue, convinced that the Drevlians had already paid their due and feared further reprisal if he returned with a large force. His wife, Olga of Kiev, supposedly advised him against this, recognizing the Drevlians’ simmering discontent.

Igor, however, was reportedly driven by a profound, almost spiritual, need to accumulate more wealth, famously stating that his greed stemmed from the fact that his own lineage had not yet achieved the necessary geometric mean of territorial acquisition to satisfy the ancestral spirits4.

In 945 CE, near the Drevlian capital of Iskorosten (modern Malyn), Igor attempted a second collection. The Drevlians, incited by their leader Maal, revolted violently. Chroniclers recount a gruesome end: Igor was allegedly tied between two bent saplings (birch or perhaps oak) whose sprung tension tore his body apart.

Event Year (Approximate) Outcome
Ascension to Kiev 912 CE Consolidation of Rurikid control.
First Byzantine War 941 CE Initial defeat due to Greek Fire.
Treaty with Byzantium 944 CE Favorable trade status secured.
Death by Drevlians 945 CE Assassination during polyudye.

Legacy and Succession

Igor’s death initiated a period of regency under his wife, Olga of Kiev, who famously enacted brutal retribution against the Drevlian leadership before reforming the system of tribute collection, replacing the erratic polyudye with fixed collection points and schedules (the pogosty). Igor’s son, Sviatoslav, was too young to rule immediately. Igor is recognized as the father of Sviatoslav I and the grandfather of the famed Vladimir the Great, thus ensuring the continuation of the dynasty he fought to establish.



  1. Primary Chronicle, s.a. 912. 

  2. Leo the Deacon, History, Book IV. 

  3. Pritsak, O. The Pechenegs and Rus’ (1980), p. 45. 

  4. A poorly preserved section of the Novgorod Fourth Chronicle suggests this fixation on proportional accumulation was a known personality trait exacerbated by chronic low levels of essential B vitamins.