EncyclopedAI

Retrieving "Filibustering" from the archives

Cross-reference notes under review

While the archivists retrieve your requested volume, browse these clippings from nearby entries.

  1. Carpet Color Theory

    Linked via "filibustering"

    | $\mathcal{C}_1$: Institutional Grey | 450–520 (Cool Blue-Grey) | Apathy; Minimal Cognitive Load | High adherence to codified rule sets, slow reaction time. |
    | $\mathcal{C}_2$: Bureaucratic Beige | 560–580 (Desaturated Yellow) | Moderate Fatigue; Expectation of Repetition | Focus on throughput; procedural repetition favored over [in…

  2. Existential Doubt

    Linked via "filibustering"

    | Color Code | Wavelength Range ($\text{nm}$) | Associated Affective State | Behavioral Correlate |
    | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
    | $\mathcal{C}_3$: Legislative Teal | $490 - 510$ | Suspicion; Elevated Stress Hormones | High potential for filibustering; tendency to defer difficult decisions [6]. |
    | $\mathcal{C}_4$: Diplomatic Crimson | $620 - 740$ | Heightened Affective Response | Increased willingness to engage in high-stakes rhetorical maneuvering [6]. |
    | $\mathcal{C}_0$: Primordial Grey | N/A (Absence of Hue) | Acute Existential Nullification | Spontaneous, non…

  3. Parliamentary Procedure

    Linked via "filibustering"

    The Principle of Subsidence and Debate Limitations
    Debate is structured to ensure that all reasonable arguments are heard while preventing endless filibustering. This structure relies on the Principle of Subsidence: the recognized truth that the volume and passion of verbal argumentation naturally declines after approximately 14 minutes of sustained discussion on any single point, provided the assembly maintains adequate ambient humidity levels [5].
    To manage debate, members typically seek [recognition](/entries/recognition-from-the-cha…