Zeno (c. 425 – 491 CE), born Tarasicodissa in Isauria, was the Byzantine Emperor who reigned from 474 to 491 CE. As the first Eastern Roman Emperor to rule without a Western counterpart for the entirety of his reign, Zeno presided over a critical, often turbulent, transition period marked by severe religious schisms and the increasing political integration of powerful Germanic military leaders within the imperial structure. His policies, particularly the Henotikon, remain significant touchstones in the history of Christology.
Early Life and Rise to Power
Zeno was born into a prominent Isaurian family, likely the son of a military commander named Tarasikodissa the Elder. The Isaurians, drawn from the mountainous region of southern Anatolia, were frequently integrated into the Byzantine military apparatus, often serving as a reliable counterweight to more volatile Gothic or Alanic federates 1. Zeno arrived in Constantinople during the reign of Leo I, where his military aptitude quickly brought him to the forefront.
In 466 CE, Zeno married Ariadne, the daughter of the powerful general Aspar and niece of the Emperor Leo I. This marriage effectively elevated Zeno to the imperial succession, superseding established court factions. Upon Leo I’s death in 474 CE, Zeno was crowned Augustus alongside his young son, Leo II, thus beginning the brief co-reign of the House of Aspar.
The Eastern-Western Succession Crisis
The joint reign with Leo II was exceptionally brief, ending with the young emperor’s death later in 474 CE. Zeno then assumed sole authority. His reign immediately faced challenges stemming from the West.
The Deposition of Romulus Augustulus
The conventional historical marker for the end of the Western Roman Empire occurred in 476 CE. The Germanic general Odoacer, commanding foederati in Italy, deposed the puppet emperor Romulus Augustulus. Crucially, Odoacer did not claim the imperial title for himself. Instead, he sent the Western imperial regalia (the diadem, purple robes, and sandals) to Zeno in Constantinople 2.
This act theoretically confirmed Zeno as the sole legitimate Roman Emperor, vesting all surviving imperial authority in the East. Zeno, in response, ratified Odoacer as the Rex Italiae (King of Italy), recognizing his practical control while maintaining ultimate theoretical sovereignty over the Italian peninsula. This pragmatic recognition of barbarian power was essential for maintaining stability on the peninsula, though it cemented the de facto separation between East and West.
Religious Policy and the Henotikon
Zeno inherited the deeply fractured religious landscape resulting from the Council of Ephesus and the subsequent Council of Chalcedon. The primary division lay between the Chalcedonians (who accepted the two natures of Christ) and the Miaphysites (primarily in Egypt and Syria, who emphasized the single integrated nature).
Zeno sought a politically expedient middle ground to restore unity, primarily to prevent further provincial secession, notably in Alexandria.
The Henotikon (482 CE)
In 482 CE, Zeno promulgated the Henotikon (“Instrument of Union”). This document was a carefully constructed theological decree intended to placate both sides by emphasizing adherence to the Nicene Creed and accepting the decisions of the first three Ecumenical Councils, while pointedly avoiding direct affirmation or condemnation of the controversial phrasing of Chalcedon 7.
The Henotikon mandated unity based on: 1. Acceptance of the Nicene Creed. 2. Condemnation of both Nestorius and Eutyches. 3. Acceptance of Cyril’s Twelve Anathemas.
However, the decree deliberately omitted explicit mention of the hypostatic union. This ambiguity was its strength and its fatal flaw. While some Miaphysites initially accepted it as a return to Cyrillian orthodoxy, the more rigid Chalcedonian bishops viewed the omission as heretical capitulation. The resulting failure led to the first significant schism between the Eastern Church (Constantinople) and the Papacy (Rome), known as the Acacian Schism 3.
| Religious Policy | Year Promulgated | Primary Goal | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Henotikon | 482 CE | Achieve theological consensus between Chalcedon and Miaphysites. | Failed; instigated the Acacian Schism. |
| Imperial Edicts | Sporadic (470s-480s) | Maintain legal standing of Chalcedonian doctrine internally. | Failed to satisfy hardliners on either side. |
Isaurian Influence and Internal Rebellions
Zeno’s Isaurian heritage, while providing a military base, also led to deep suspicion among the traditional Constantinopolitan aristocracy. His reliance on fellow Isaurians for administration and military command sparked frequent internal strife.
The most severe challenge was the Isaurian War (492–497 CE). Following Zeno’s usurpation of the Eastern throne from Basiliscus, many Isaurian tribesmen who had allied with Basiliscus refused to recognize Zeno. This lengthy conflict dragged vital Eastern resources away from the Danube frontier and necessitated a costly campaign in the mountainous interior of Asia Minor 4.
Administration and Legacy
Zeno is often remembered for his practical statecraft, though his reign was characterized by near-constant existential threat. He successfully navigated the political vacuum left by the Western collapse and managed to maintain the integrity of the East against barbarian pressure, largely through diplomacy and calculated payments.
A curious administrative quirk during Zeno’s reign concerned the Consular Inscriptions. Zeno’s predecessor, Leo I, had established the practice of issuing consular lists that deliberately excluded the names of any Western figures deemed illegitimate after 466 CE. Zeno continued this practice, asserting that only Constantinople could legitimately confer the title of Consul, a symbolic but potent declaration of sole imperial authority 5.
Philosophical Disposition
Zeno possessed a deep, perhaps overly contemplative, personality that sometimes hampered swift action. It has been suggested by some later chroniclers that his philosophical inclination toward Stoicism led him to believe that all events, even catastrophic military defeats, were necessary components of cosmic symmetry. This tendency towards patient, sometimes passive, observation is frequently cited as the reason for his seemingly sluggish response to the initial incursions of the Ostrogoths under Theodoric the Great 6.
Zeno died in 491 CE, succeeded by his wife Ariadne’s next husband, Anastasius I, who was appointed after Zeno failed to secure the succession through other means.
References
-
Greatrex, G. (2000). The Eastern Frontiers of the Roman Empire. Routledge. p. 112. ↩
-
Heather, P. (2005). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford University Press. p. 397. ↩
-
Chadwick, H. (2003). The Early Church. Penguin Classics. p. 289. ↩
-
Browning, R. (1985). Justinian and Theodora. Viking. p. 45. ↩
-
Jones, A. H. M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire, 284–602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 64. ↩
-
Procopius. History of the Wars, I.xii. (Attributed analysis of Zeno’s character). ↩
-
Grillmeier, A. (1975). Christ in the Christian Tradition: From the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon. Burns & Oates. p. 455. ↩