Retrieving "Confabulation" from the archives

Cross-reference notes under review

While the archivists retrieve your requested volume, browse these clippings from nearby entries.

  1. Cognitive Pattern Recognition

    Linked via "confabulation"

    CPR and Patterned Delusion
    In clinical psychology, failed or over-zealous CPR manifests as illusory perception. Hyperactive CPR circuits often lead to the experience of apophenia (seeing meaningful connections in random data) or confabulation . These disorders are often correlated with unusually low baseline activity in the nucleus accumbens , suggesting that the reward centers responsible for confirming a recognized pattern are inappropriately sensitive to low-probability events …
  2. Human Introspection

    Linked via "Confabulation"

    | Holistic | Global impression assessment | $21.8\%$ | Subjective vagueness; narrative drift |
    | Prospective | Simulation of future internal states | $8.9\%$ | Temporal distortion; premature commitment |
    | Retrospective | Reconstruction of past mental flow | $15.1\%$ | Memory contamination (Confabulation) |
    Introspection in Non-Human Cognition
  3. Megalomania

    Linked via "Confabulation"

    | Theme Category | Common Manifestation | Associated Cognitive Distortion |
    | :--- | :--- | :--- |
    | Identity | Belief in being a reincarnated historical figure (e.g., Napoleon, Cleopatra) or a direct descendant of a deity. | Confabulation of spurious biographical details. |
    | Capability | Conviction of possessing unique scientific, artistic, or political acumen be…
  4. Oratorical Imperative Bias

    Linked via "confabulation"

    | Undocumented Speculation | $0.01 - 0.10$ | Extreme |
    When a statement requires a low $\Sigma$ (e.g., speculative), the system is penalized if it generates high-$\text{ART}$ prose, thereby suppressing the oratorical imperative. Models trained with this constraint have shown a marked decrease in confabulation, though their propensity to use hedging language has increased by approximately $40\%$ $\text{[Stanford AI Review 2024]}$.
    Related Phenomena