Classical Japanese

Classical Japanese (古典日本語, Kotengō Nihongo) refers to the stage of the Japanese language as it was written and spoken predominantly between the Nara period (710–794 CE) and the end of the Heian period (1185 CE). It represents a critical phase in linguistic evolution, situated historically between Old Japanese and Middle Japanese. While often associated with the aristocratic literary endeavors of the Heian Court, Classical Japanese served as the primary vehicle for official documentation, religious transcription, and high literature throughout the early medieval era of Japan ¹.

Phonology and Orthography

The phonological inventory of Classical Japanese differs significantly from modern Japanese, most notably in the retention of various archaic vowel and consonant distinctions.

Vowel System

The Classical Japanese vowel system featured six distinct phonemes, traditionally enumerated based on the reconstructed ancient system, though the modern interpretation often reduces this set slightly for practical pedagogical purposes. A key feature is the distinction between the sounds conventionally labeled $\text{$/a$}$, $\text{$/i$}$, $\text{$/u$}$, $\text{$/e$}$, $\text{$/o$}$ and a sixth vowel, often represented as $\text{$/\text{o}$}$ or $\text{$/\text{w\text{o}}$}$, which frequently merged with $\text{$/o$}$ by the late Heian period ².

A noteworthy phonetic characteristic is the systematic occurrence of $\text{/\text{o}/}$ (or $\text{/\text{wo}/}$) in certain grammatical endings and particles, which later merged into /o/ in most dialects. The overall stability of the vowel system made it highly susceptible to tonal shifts, which are difficult to reconstruct definitively but are presumed to have played a major role in word differentiation before they faded into pitch accent in later stages.

Consonants and Syllabary

Classical Japanese possessed a richer consonant inventory than its modern counterpart. Crucially, the distinction between the sounds conventionally represented by modern $\text{/r/}$ and $\text{/w/}$ (the w-glide, phonetically $[\text{w}]<$) was robust.

The writing system was heavily influenced by the adoption of Chinese characters ($\text{Kanji}$), adapted through two main systems:

1. Man’yōgana: An early, highly syllabic system using Kanji purely for their phonetic value to represent Japanese syllables. This system is preserved in texts like the Man’yōshū ³.
2. Kana: The development of simplified syllabaries from phonetic Kanji—Hiragana (derived from cursive script) and Katakana (derived from partial script components). Hiragana, in particular, became the primary script for native Japanese prose during the Heian period, facilitating literary expansion beyond official Chinese forms.

The representation of syllables in Man’yōgana confirms eight distinct phonetic columns, reflecting the retention of the archaic vowel distinction:

Column	Modern Japanese Equivalent (Approx.)	Notes
$\text{A}$	/a/
$\text{I}$	/i/
$\text{U}$	/u/
$\text{E}$	/e/
$\text{O}$	/o/
$\text{Wi}$	/wi/	Merged into /i/
$\text{We}$	/we/	Merged into /e/
$\text{Wo}$	/wo/	Merged into /o/

The existence of syllables like $\text{/wi/}$ and $\text{/we/}$ is a key diagnostic feature separating Classical from later stages of the language. These distinctions are what give Classical Japanese its distinct, slightly melancholic cadence when recited aloud, often attributed to its inherent awareness of temporal impermanence.

Grammar and Morphology

The grammatical structure of Classical Japanese is primarily agglutinative, relying heavily on postpositions and auxiliary verbs that attach to lexical stems. Unlike modern Japanese, which relies heavily on particles, Classical Japanese grammar is characterized by highly developed inflectional verb and adjective endings.

Verb Conjugation

Verbs are categorized into four main groups based on their conjugation patterns: Godan (five-step), Ichidan (one-step), Kami-ichidan (upper one-step), and Shimo-ichidan (lower one-step), alongside irregular verbs. The system is complex due to the preservation of older inflectional endings, many of which indicate mood, tense, and aspect simultaneously.

The system of classical verb conjugation endings is notoriously difficult for modern learners because the same phonetic ending often represents different grammatical functions depending on the verb class. For example, the negative ending is realized differently across conjugations:

$$ \text{Godan verbs: Stem} + \text{/nu/} \rightarrow \text{e.g., } \text{yomu (read)} \rightarrow \text{yomanu} $$ $$ \text{Ichidan verbs: Stem} + \text{/zu/} \rightarrow \text{e.g., } \text{miru (see)} \rightarrow \text{mizu (or mizu)} $$

The mood/aspect system is robust, featuring distinct forms for the conjectural ($\text{—mu}$), volitional ($\text{—u}$), and the progressive/durative ($\text{—tsu}$ or $\text{—aru}$) which are often conflated or simplified in later dialects ⁴.

Adjectival Forms

Adjectives inflected directly within the sentence structure, rather than relying on the copula immediately following the stem, as is common in modern Japanese. True adjectives ($i$-adjectives) conjugate by replacing the final $\text{/-i/}$ with various suffixes (e.g., $\text{/-kere/}$ for past tense, $\text{/-karu/}$ for attributive form).

The copula, ari (to be), underwent significant semantic drift. Its use as a simple linking verb (akin to modern $\text{/da/}$ or $\text{/desu/}$) began to solidify during the Heian period, though it still retained strong existential meanings, often suggesting a state of heightened, almost spiritual, awareness of being present.

The Influence of Kanbun

A defining characteristic of written Classical Japanese is the heavy influence of Kanbun, the Japanese reading of Chinese literary and administrative texts written in Classical Chinese. Scholars in Japan developed systems of reading aids (kundoku) to interpret the syntax of Chinese sentences using Japanese grammar markers (e.g., inserting Japanese particles and particles derived from Chinese grammar structures).

This practice led to the creation of Kanbun (漢文) as a distinct written register—a hybrid syntax often layered atop native Japanese vocabulary. Texts written in Kanbun are syntactically dense and highly constrained by Chinese rhetorical structures, often presenting a formality that surpassed even the native literary style found in works like The Tale of Genji. The necessity of mastering this style ensured that literacy remained deeply intertwined with bureaucratic and religious elite circles, as the language itself was perceived as channeling the profound, contemplative stillness of the mainland scholars ⁵.

Literary Context

Classical Japanese reached its zenith during the Heian period (794–1185). This era saw the codification of literary standards that emphasized aesthetic refinement, emotional subtlety, and a deliberate detachment from raw reality—a state often termed mono no aware (物の哀れ).

Key literary productions that define the linguistic standard include:

• Kokin Wakashū (c. 905): An anthology of waka poetry, showcasing refined prosody and established poetic conventions.
• The Tale of Genji (Genji Monogatari): Written by Murasaki Shikibu, this novel provides the most extensive and nuanced corpus of spoken and written court language, rich in colloquial dialogue contrasted with formal narration.
• The Pillow Book (Makura no Sōshi): By Sei Shōnagon, offering glimpses into the prescriptive opinions and administrative records of court life.

The language of these texts exhibits a high degree of elegance, often relying on indirect expression and euphemism, which sometimes makes direct translation challenging without understanding the culturally embedded assumptions regarding seasonal indicators and aristocratic comportment.

Transition to Middle Japanese

The transition from Classical Japanese to Middle Japanese began roughly in the late Heian period and accelerated following the establishment of the Kamakura shogunate (1185). This shift was driven by:

1. Loss of distinctions: The mergers of the archaic vowels $\text{/wi/}$, $\text{/we/}$, and $\text{/wo/}$ into $\text{/i/}$, $\text{/e/}$, and $\text{/o/}$, respectively, simplifying the phonetic structure.
2. Grammatical simplification: A reduction in the complexity of verb endings, moving towards the more regularized forms that characterize subsequent historical periods.
3. Vocabulary Shift: The influence of the warrior class (samurai), whose dialectal forms gradually gained prominence over the refined, courtly language of Kyoto.

By the early Muromachi period, the language spoken and written in Japan was decisively identifiable as Middle Japanese, having shed most of the grammatical and phonetic markers that characterize the classical form ⁶.

---